Even as we celebrate a great victory in the Supreme Court on the ruling of Windsor vs. the United States (down with DOMA!) we must acknowledge that not all rulings this week have been in the favor of justice and equality.
Two days ago the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 on the repeal of the coverage formula of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The Voting Rights Act, implemented in 1965, protects those who have been historically disenfranchised (i.e. people of color and immigrants) from the states seizing their rights to vote through subversive tactics such as poll taxes or literacy tests. Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits tactics such as these: voting regulations with the specific intent of preventing those of any race or ethnicity from voting. Section 5 was a little bit more precise. This Section directly addressed those states whose have historically disenfranchised minority race or language groups. Section 5 decreed that any changes to voting regulations in certain "jurisdictions" must be given the stamp of approval by the Department of Justice. Basically, it was a buffer for racist disenfranchisement, protecting the rights of people in those "jurisdictions" who would steal them away.
While Section 5 remains, the coverage formula, deciding which states must abide by the pre-clearance requirement, does not. Now the power lies with Congress to decide upon a new coverage formula, and we will all wait with baited breath to see if justice wins out. If certain "jurisdictions" are given the license to make their own voting regulations without pre-clearance, the voices of thousands of Americans could be stolen away overnight. Yes, in the future any individual may object to a particular law, and one day the case may make it to the Supreme Court. But in the interim who knows how many individuals will be disenfranchised.
For an idea of the states response to the Supreme Court's decision, read this. Less than 48 hours from the official ruling, 6 states already began taking action in their legislature to impose more stringent voting regulations. This is scary stuff, and could affect thousands of Americans trying to have their voices heard in their state government and in our national government.
At this historical juncture, we all must hope that Congress can work together, Democrats and Republicans alike, to protect freedom and rights of all Americans, no matter their native language or the color of their skin.
Voting Rights Act Coverage Formula Repealed: Supreme Court Strikes Again!
Related Issues
Related content
![](https://www.aclumaine.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_130x110/public/field_image/2024_january_national_popular_vote_compact_generic_square_2_large_large.jpeg?itok=YeBVGYxV)
National Popular Vote Compact
January 3, 2024![](https://www.aclumaine.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_130x110/public/screenshot_2023-08-24_at_11.59.29_am.png?itok=51KTNr3P)
Voting Rights Lawsuit, Maine Groups Call on Governor Mills and...
September 21, 2020![](https://www.aclumaine.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_130x110/public/screenshot_2023-08-24_at_11.59.29_am.png?itok=51KTNr3P)
ACLU of Maine and Maine Conservation Voters File Amicus Brief in...
September 1, 2020Casey et al. v. Yarmouth
August 27, 2019Committee Votes Against Discriminatory Voter ID Bill
March 1, 2019TODAY: ACLU in Augusta to Testify Against Discriminatory Voter ID Bill
February 27, 2019![](https://www.aclumaine.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_130x110/public/field_image/pollingbooth.jpg?itok=LtMA57OU)
What Voter Suppression, Harassment and Intimidation Look Like &...
November 5, 2018![](https://www.aclumaine.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_130x110/public/field_image/votesforwomen.jpg?itok=HPGBnh8M)